TaskZenith vs Todoist
Todoist is a fast, ubiquitous task list with AI features bolted on top. TaskZenith is built around a different problem: turning one big, fuzzy goal into a real plan, and proposing a new time — never applying it automatically — when a step gets missed.
| TaskZenith | Todoist | |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Yes, real | Yes (up to 5 projects) |
| Paid price | CAD $10/mo (Pro, live today) | $5–7/mo Pro · $8/mo Business |
| Breaks big goals into AI tasks | Yes (Gemini), whole objectives | Partial — "Task Assist" splits single tasks into subtasks, not full goals |
| Reschedules a missed task | Yes — AI proposes, you confirm | No — fully manual |
| Native apps, every platform, offline | No (installable PWA) | Yes, polished over years |
| Integrations | Internal only (Zapier/webhooks on the roadmap) | Huge ecosystem (Zapier + hundreds of apps) |
| Natural-language capture | Yes, newer and less battle-tested | Yes, polished over years |
| Gamification | Basic streaks | Karma points, no coaching |
| Angle | A coach that breaks down goals and reschedules with empathy | A fast, everywhere task list |
Where Todoist wins
Platform breadth — native apps everywhere, real offline support — and an integration ecosystem that would be expensive to match any time soon. It also has years of polish in natural-language capture.
Where TaskZenith wins
The actual planning intelligence: Todoist doesn't break a big goal into a plan, and it doesn't reschedule anything by default — at its core it's a list with AI features added on top, not a planner. The "coach" angle versus the "list" angle.
Verdict
Todoist wins on platform breadth and maturity — not worth competing there short-term (the installable PWA is enough for now). TaskZenith wins on the specific problem Todoist doesn't solve: turning a big, diffuse goal into a real plan, and not leaving you on your own when that plan slips in the first week.